Search Mac Software Downloads
|
EDITOR NOTES
'Download Now' yields the Intel version; see 'Related Links' for the PowerPC version.
DESCRIPTION
Norton AntiVirus Definitions are the latest anti-virus detection files. The installer will automatically update Norton AntiVirus 11 virus definitions and engine files to detect and repair the most recently discovered Macintosh viruses. This file is a self-extracting archive which contains the Norton AntiVirus Virus Definitions Installer. Once downloaded and expanded on your hard drive, simply double-click on the Installer and the appropriate files will be installed on your computer.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 09/02/2010: Release notes were unavailable when this listing was updated.
REQUIREMENTS
  • Mac OS X 10.4 or later.
  • Norton AntiVirus 11.x, or Norton AntiVirus 10.2.

SHARE

Developer:Symantec Corporation
Downloads:85,999
  - Version d/l:23
Utilities:Virus
License:Updater
Date:31 Aug 2010
Platform:PPC/Intel

OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
Suggest something else:
Norton AntiVirus Definitions User Reviews (71 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Aug 31 2010

DR. GIRLFRIEND  I think 26CAB40's review on August 18 says it all. If you value your computer (and your sanity), keep Norton's crapware off your Mac at all costs.

Try VirusTotal instead; it runs multiple antivirus engines in one shot. Read about it here:

http://www.virustotal.com/about.html

They even have a Firefox addon that lets you download files directly with VirusTotal's web application before storing them on your system. It even scans URLs.  
(Version 08/31/2010)

praisebury
0
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 1 2010

NEGRITUDE  From the web site:

"Warning

VirusTotal is not a substitute for any antivirus software installed in a PC, since it only scans individual files on demand. It does not offer permanent protection for users' systems either."  
(Version 09/01/2010)

praisebury
0
Sep 2 2010

DR. GIRLFRIEND  You forgot this part (written right under your quote):

"Currently, there is no solution that offers 100% effectiveness in detecting viruses and malware. You may become a victim of deceitful advertising, if you buy such a product under those premises."

That's the key right there. Ultimately, responsibility lies with the user.

If you practice safe computing, you don't need any anti-virus app installed on your computer... especially if you're on a Mac.  
(Version 09/01/2010)

praisebury
0

Aug 23 2010

STUDIODAVE56  Still listing this as free when it is a subscription based program. With your purchase of the program it includes a 1 year subscription to these updates after that you must continue to pay for yearly subscriptions in order to use the updates. This is not free. There is nothing you can do with this without paying for the program.  
(Version 08/23/2010)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Aug 18 2010
*....

26CAB40  I tried the latest iteration of Norton on a few known problematic files.

Small PC files loaded with Trojans/exploits etc.

I normally use a dedicated PC with NOD32 to run all files through, especially those that might be passed to friends or colleagues.

I also use Bitdefender Online for second pass and finally ClamXAV just to be complete.

In a VMWare sandbox I have 10 files, all infected, that I keep as a test set, the oldest Trojan variant in there is 4 YEARS OLD !!!

The most recent was sent to me last week.

NOD32 picks up 9 out of ten but warns about the remaining file.

Bitdefender Online picks up 8 out of the ten.

Clam XAV also picks up 8 (surprising us all).

Norton picks up 1.

The 4 year old exploit.

Norton also shows the highest CPU drain and consumes twice the memory of Bitdefender Online.

In Bitdefenders defense it's already running in a rather bloated browser.

It's awful, bloated, slow and has a bigger imprint than Sasquatch.

Avoid this at all costs.  
(Version 08/18/2010)

praisebury
+3
[ Reply ]
Jun 8 2010

NEGRITUDE  I use both ClamXav and Norton AntiVirus 11 for manual scanning under Leopard. I got NAV for free from my cable internet provider (it was part of Norton Internet Security 4).

One thing I notice is that ClamXav seems to detect email viruses that NAV completely misses. Can someone clarify whether the signatures in NAV for Mac are OS X specific, and do not include Windows viruses? Do you need to purchase the "dual protection" version of NAV in order to get Windows virus signatures included in your scanning?

Is it possible that ClamXav is giving me false positives, or have a missed a configuration setting for NAV?  
(Version 06/04/2010)

praisebury
+2
[ Reply ]
Jun 7 2010

AARGL  Well... someday, some virus might destroy your Mac... ;-D

When OSX appeared, there was that threat that with the expansion of Apple's market some nasty pirate would begin to make viruses and it would end just as it is for pc users... and it was nearly 10 years ago, now.

So, it would be stupid to say "there will never be viruses on Mac!", but until now I've never got one and never heard of anyone getting one.

The main risk might be running pc apps on your Mac, but except for that, the risk is so tiny that I continue sleeping without any antivirus, and I'm sleeping well... ;-)

(to me, the most terrible viruses in Macs are all those damned pc parts they put in since old powerpc days, beginning with IDE instead of SCSI, that made Macs cheaper but weaker :-(  
(Version 06/04/2010)

praisebury
+2
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 2 2010

MACMEND.COM  They are there, when the last version of iWork came out it was heavily pirated and many of these pirated disk image copies carried a mac trojan.   
(Version 08/02/2010)

praisebury
-2
Aug 23 2010

STUDIODAVE56  A Trojan is not a virus, it is a program that you must run. A virus is a program that can infect and run without your help.  
(Version 08/23/2010)

praisebury
0

May 11 2010

DER~BOT~HAUS  145MB?  
(Version 05/11/2010)

praisebury
+3
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jul 19 2010

GOBRA  Yeah, they are fighting thousands phantom viruses on Mac, definitely need 145mb on your hard drive!  
(Version 07/19/2010)

praisebury
+1

Sep 25 2009

EFF  Simply because you've never encountered one, doesn't mean they didn't exist. I caught one back in days of my trusty ole' SE30 while installing a game from a floppy I had purchased at a local book store. Luckily, it was a variant of Code 252 which just displayed a creepy message and then deleted itself.

And if you don't believe the page I linked to above, take it from the horse's mouth:

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=50569

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=30345 (under "MBDF virus and Mac OS 8")

So yes, you are correct in that there are currently no viruses for any version of OS X, and with very few exceptions OS X users don't need to be concerned about the issue (I don't have AV software installed on any of Macs, btw), aside from exercising common sense when surfing/downloading files.

But that does not mean that a) there never were any viruses on the Mac platform in the past, and b) there may not be poo-ware attacking OS X in the future.

All that being said, I think we can agree on two points: Norton AV, in its current state, is a POS, and the AV developer's money-grabbing schemes are ridiculous.  
(Version 9/24/09)

praisebury
-2
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 25 2009

EFF  Aw crap, the above was in reply to FRANKHOGG's second comment. An edit/delete button for one's own comments would go a long way here ...  
(Version 9/24/09)

praisebury
+3
Dec 27 2009

CANADIANPJ  I agree that Apple users should be much more aware of coming viruses to the platform. Apple marketshare is rising which means the viruses are going to be coming along sooner or later.

What I would not recommend is installing his bloatware. I gave up on Norton on the PC a long time ago. There are other alternatives for the Mac which are just as effective and far less bloat.  
(Version 12/25/09)

praisebury
+3

Sep 6 2009

ILGAZ  If this release included "signature updates for the unpatched java security hole on pre OS X 10.5 systems" as release note, I would run to Symantec store and buy it.

Of course, they are so busy with including Windows virus signatures and proof of concept junk rather than real threats, backdoors.

I don't want to spam this site so consider this comment for every single AV running under OS X, even including "free" ones. If you aren't protecting against an active threat, you don't deserve a single CPU cycle.  
(Version 9/4/09)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 2 2009

CYBORG9  Norton antivirus? The mere mention of that name should give any self respecting Mac user a case of spontaneous, explosive diarrhea.

Truthfully, as has oft been said, there just ain't no active virus threat out there in the wild for Macs at the moment.

One of these days, there likely will be.

So, it might be wise to have some anti virus protection at one's disposal. There is, though,

no reason to pay through the nose for some virus protection such as the dreaded and sickening Norton or the quite overpriced Intego VirusBarrier (they've got a $30 yearly fee for virus definition updates after one's first year of Virusbarrier use).

There's the highly regarded and free ClamX.   
(Version 9/1/09)

praisebury
+9
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 18 2009

IGREG  The new iAntiVirus by PC Tools works nicely with background scanning (and no apparent slowing of the system), easy interface, fast updates and there is a free version. The weaknesses of ClamX AV are its fairly complex interface, weakness in providing much automatic protection. Although ClamX AV is also free.

I have always used an antivirus, not because it is really needed at this time, but to be familiar & comfortable using an antivirus if & when it is really needed.

Norton AV and Intego AV are both good, and while the purchase prices are not too bad, the annual virus definitions subscriptions are way too expensive.   
(Version 9/18/09)

praisebury
0

Aug 19 2009

FRANKHOGG  I've been using Macs since 1984 and I don't use any "AntiVirus" software, free or paid for simply because THERE ARE NO VIRUSES FOR A MAC! Never have been. I've never had a problem... NEVER!

Do you know why there are two lion statues in front of the NY Public Library? The answer is they keep the elephants away. Hey it works just as well as any anti virus software for the Mac does.  
(Version 8/18/09)

praisebury
+3
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 24 2009

EFF  Normally, I wouldn't have replied to a comment like this but since you're boasting about your historical knowledge of the Mac (since 1984, no less!!) ... yes, THERE HAVE BEEN viruses specifically targeting Mac OS (Classic) *prior* to OS X. It wasn't even a fraction of the poo-ware targeting Windows back then but it existed nonetheless.

Kindly point your browser to: "http://bit.ly/macviruses", scroll to "7.0 What viruses can affect Mac users?", read, and in the future please refrain from spreading false statements disguised as historical knowledge.

Now, there's nothing wrong with not knowing everything (noone does, except for Stephen Fry), but there's everything wrong WITH SHOUTING falsehoods disguised as facts.  
(Version 9/24/09)

praisebury
0
Sep 25 2009

FRANKHOGG  As you said the document you referred us to dates to January of 2000 and deals with Classic, not OSX. I do not, nor can I, attest to the veracity of that 9+ year old web page. But I will restate that I have never had a virus since starting to use Macs in 1984. Even Leo Laporte agrees with me but clarifies it by stating that there has never been a virus "in the wild" for Macs. Proof of concept perhaps but nothing that would support wasting money, time and system resources on virus software. When and if it becomes a problem then I will address it, not before. Google, "leo laporte mac virus" for more info. I don't know who you are but most techies know who Leo Laporte is. I feel that I am in good company and stand by my original statement. You can Google my name too and you'll see I've been around a good long while.

As far as I'm concerned you can use anti virus software, wear tin foil hats whatever floats your boat. But in my many years of experience using and servicing Macs I have never had a virus, trojan horse etc. problem. Take that for what it's worth.  
(Version 9/24/09)

praisebury
+2

View all 71 posts >>